MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416257154 · doi:10.2196/70272

Artificial Intelligence–Enhanced Multi-Algorithm R Shiny Application for Predictive Modeling and Analytics: Case Study of Alzheimer Disease Diagnostics

2025· article· en· W4416257154 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Edmund Fosu Agyemang, Sudesh Srivastav, Jeffrey G. Shaffer, Samuel Kakraba

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Aging · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersStrongTulane University
KeywordsAlzheimer's diseaseArtificial neural networkDiseasePattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: AI has demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared to medical practitioners, highlighting its growing importance in healthcare. SMART-Pred (Shiny Multi-Algorithm R Tool for Predictive Modeling) is an innovative AI-based application for Alzheimer's disease (AD) prediction using handwriting analysis. OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a non-invasive, cost-effective AI tool for early AD detection, addressing the need for accessible and accurate screening methods. METHODS: The study employed Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for dimensionality reduction of handwriting data, followed by training and evaluation of ten diverse AI models, including logistic regression, Naïve Bayes, random forest, AdaBoost, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and neural network. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and ROC-AUC metrics. The DARWIN dataset, comprising handwriting samples from 174 participants (89 AD patients, 85 healthy controls) was used for validation. RESULTS: The Neural Network classifier achieved an accuracy of 91% with a 95% CI ranging from 0.79-0.97 and an AUC of 94%, on the test set after identifying the most significant features for AD prediction. These results surpass current clinical diagnostic tools, which typically achieve around 81% accuracy. SMART-Pred's performance aligns with recent AI advancements in AD prediction, such as the Cambridge scientists' AI tool achieving 82% accuracy in identifying AD progression within three years using cognitive tests and MRI scans. The variables "air_time" and "paper_time" consistently emerged as critical predictors for AD across all ten AI models, highlighting their potential importance in early detection and risk assessment. To augment transparency and interpretability, we incorporated the principles of explainable AI, specifically using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values, a state-of-the-art method to emphasize the features responsible for our model's efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: SMART-Pred offers non-invasive, cost-effective, and efficient AD prediction, demonstrating the transformative potential of AI in healthcare. While clinical validation is necessary to confirm the practical applicability of the identified key variables, this study contributes to the growing body of research on AI-assisted AD diagnosis and may lead to improved patient outcomes through early detection and intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score0.831

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.187
GPT teacher head0.514
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR AgingSame topicArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207