MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416272000 · doi:10.1638/2025-0012

SLENDER-TAILED MEERKAT (Suricata suricatta) FATALITIES ATTRIBUTED TO NEORICKETTSIOSIS ASSOCIATED WITH INTESTINAL TREMATODIASIS (PARALECITHODENDRIUM NAVICULUM)

2025· article· W4416272000 on OpenAlexaff
Michael M. Garner, John Kinsella, Michele Persiani, Daniel S. Bradway, Genevieve Dumonceaux, Ric Berlinski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsCentre for Global Health Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrganismParasite hostingTransmission (telecommunications)CrayfishWildlife diseaseAquatic animalPathogen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paralecithodendrium naviculum (Trematoda) is a common parasite of bats in North America. This organism has occasionally also been reported in raccoons and mink. Lecithodendriid trematodes are multiple life stage parasites which use snails as the first intermediate host and aquatic arthropods (insects and crayfish) as the infective intermediate host. Meerkats at the Toledo Zoo have traditionally been offered crayfish (Cambarus diogenes) as seasonally available enrichment. In June 2012, three of four slender-tailed meerkats (Suricata suricatta) developed acute lethargy, cardiac and respiratory distress, then died either shortly after empirical treatment was initiated or before any treatment could be initiated. Histologic examination revealed intestinal trematodiasis and systemic lymphoplasmacytic inflammation, most notably in the heart, kidneys, liver, lungs, spleen, and skeletal muscle. Paralecithodendrium naviculum was identified in all three meerkats and in the crayfish. Rickettsiaceae were identified in liver tissue by transmission electron microscopy. A novel Neorickettsia species was identified in tissues from all three meerkats by PCR followed by sequencing. This disease, which resembles salmon poisoning in canids, has not been previously reported in meerkats. This study identifies a potential risk of live enrichment feeding. It also highlights the risks of exposing animals in zoos to organisms to which they are evolutionarily naive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Zoo and Wildlife MedicineSame topicParasite Biology and Host InteractionsFrench-language works237,207