MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416275993 · doi:10.2196/81830

Teledermatology to Support Self-Care in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria

2025· article· en· W4416275993 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Laura Schuehlein, Martin Peters, Graham B. Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Dermatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrticaria and Related Conditions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTeledermatologyMedical prescriptionDiseaseMEDLINEDuration (music)Omalizumab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unlabelled: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is an autoimmune prompted skin disorder, whose hallmarks include the unpredictable onset of hives and itch. Symptom duration typically exceed 6 weeks, and flares can occur for up to 5 years or longer if untreated, impacting potentially any area of the body. The absence of obvious triggers and the variation in onset frequency often delays formal diagnosis which on average is approximately 2 years from first presentation. Initial standard of care is the use of low through to higher strength antihistamines in the first instance, with eventual escalation to prescription anti-inflammatory agents and potentially biologics once patients are under managed care. The societal impacts of delays in diagnosis are marked, with data suggesting CSU impacts up to 1% of the population, primarily of working age and with twice the prevalence in women. Herein, we advocate for the deployment of smartphone imaging and generative artificial intelligence technology to improve detection and early management of CSU through integrated self-care approaches. Such approaches embodying the tenets of P4 personalized medicine could have sustained impact on the disease through awareness campaigns, reducing the burden on the dermatology community and facilitating earlier access to curative therapeutic interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.372
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR DermatologySame topicUrticaria and Related ConditionsFrench-language works237,207