MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416276023 · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(25)00362-6

Causes of death in rural southeast Asia by electronic verbal autopsy: a population-based observational study

2025· article· en· W4416276023 on OpenAlexaff
Nan Shwe Nwe Htun, Koukeo Phommasone, Carlo Perrone, Aung Pyae Phyo, Aninda Sen, Moul Vanna, Rupam Tripura, Nawrin Kabir, Md Akramul Islam, Jindaporn Wirachonphaophong, Patcharaporn Panyadee, Arjun Chandna, Supachai Boonyoung, Dysoley Lek, Tiengkham Pongvongsa, Mayfong Mayxay, Rajeev Kamadod, Nicholas Day, Shaun K. Morris, Elizabeth A. Ashley, Prabhat Jha, Sue J. Lee, Yoel Lubell, Thomas J. Peto

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Global Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutopsy Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioCentre for Global Health Research
FundersWellcome Trust
KeywordsSoutheast asiaObservational studyVerbal autopsyRural areaMEDLINERural population

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: In low-income and middle-income countries in southeast Asia, most deaths occur outside of the health-care system without a medically certified cause of death. We did a verbal autopsy study to determine the underlying causes of death in rural areas of the region and to estimate premature mortality using years of life lost (YLLs). METHODS: In this population-based observational study, we conducted electronic verbal autopsy surveys for reported deaths in 510 villages in Bangladesh, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and Thailand from 2021 to 2024. With the WHO 2016 verbal autopsy questionnaire, trained fieldworkers conducted interviews, and local physicians independently assigned causes of death by ICD-10 codes. Causes of death were ranked based on cause-specific mortality fractions (CSMFs), and YLLs calculated using corresponding national life expectancy. FINDINGS: Over 90% of reported deaths had a verbal autopsy administered. Among 3413 deaths, 2052 (60%) were male and 1361 (40%) were female, and 3245 (95%) were older than 12 years. Across sites, 64-86% of deaths occurred at home. Non-communicable diseases were the leading causes of death, ranging from 54% in Laos to 70% in Cambodia, with cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, cancer, and digestive conditions being the most common. Maternal, nutritional, and communicable diseases, mainly respiratory infections, diarrhoea, and tuberculosis, accounted for 11-26% of deaths across the sites. Accidents and injuries comprised 7-13% and ranked among the top five causes. Major gaps in death documentation persist across all countries, whereas disease-specific causes of death varied between sites. Non-communicable diseases accounted for the majority of YLLs, representing between 56% and 65% across the five countries. INTERPRETATION: This multicountry study highlighted the significant burden of non-communicable diseases in rural southeast Asia, alongside persistent communicable diseases, emphasising the need for better mortality data and health-care access to reduce this dual burden. FUNDING: Wellcome Trust. TRANSLATIONS: For the Myanmar, Karen, Bangla, Thai, Lao and Khmer translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Global HealthSame topicAutopsy Techniques and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207