MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416277096 · doi:10.1039/d5sc05888k

The ultrastiff crystals of mucic (galactaric) acid

2025· article· en· W4416277096 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Durga Prasad Karothu, Ibrahim Tahir, Sanjit Manohar Majhi, Ejaz Ahmed, Luca Catalano, Niamh T. Hickey, James Weston, Sarah Guerin, Pancě Naumov

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCrystallography and molecular interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Research CouncilTamkeenResearch Institute Centers, New York University Abu DhabiYork UniversityNew York University Abu Dhabi
KeywordsNanoindentationStiffnessCrystal (programming language)ModulusModuliPhysical propertyBulk modulusElastic modulus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

= 15) for the (010)/(01̄0) faces. Comparison with other organic crystals using material property plots not only underscores the unique combination of high stiffness and high density in this material, rooted in its extensive network of intermolecular hydrogen bonds, but also confirms that it has the highest-to-date measured surface stiffness among the organic crystals. This result is expected to guide the discovery of other extraordinarily stiff organic crystals that could be of interest as mechanically robust, lightweight materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical ScienceSame topicCrystallography and molecular interactionsFrench-language works237,207