MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416282917 · doi:10.17491/jgsi/2008/720601

‘Heavenly Bounty’: Some thoughts on Impact Metallogeny

2008· article· en· W4416282917 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
B.P. Radhakrishna

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Geological Society of India · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpace Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetallogenyHydrogeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Impact cratering must be one of the most spectacular displays ever witnessed in the solar system.Although the ancient Indian astronomers, the ancient Vedic texts and the poets who have chronicled the history of India in the great Ra ma yana and Maha bha rata, described heavenly events in the past in lines of great poetic beauty, the subject has not evoked much interest in the modern generation of geoscientists.India has a hoary tradition of study of astronomical bodies, but these studies have come to be neglected, considered more as myths deserving no serious attention. Impact Metallogeny"Impact Metallogeny" may be defined as the study of major metallic and diamond deposits from the perspective of extra-terrestrial impacts that have been directly or indirectly responsible for metallogeny.An increasingly large body of evidence -geochemical (trace and rare element data, stable isotope systematics, field and structural data, geographical distribution patterns) is pointing to a causal link between impact processes and metallogeny either directly or indirectly.My plea is to re-examine our known large metallic and diamond areas from this fresh perspective so that we identify and characterise major impact structures and related metallogeny in the Indian sub-continent. The Mystery of Abnormal Concentration of Metals at Selected 'Hot Spots' in the EarthSpectacular concentrations of gold and uranium are to be found in the Witwatersrand Basin in South Africa, from where over 50,000 tonnes of gold have already been extracted and another 50,000 tonnes indicated in reserve; at Homestake Mines, (South Dakota); Colorado Mineral belt with its several large deposits; at Porcupine district of Ontario, (Canada); at Cadea (New South Wales), Kalgoorlie, Bendigo and Ballarat of Victoria, (Australia); nickel and platinum group elements at Sudbury (Canada); chromite, nickel and platinum at Bushveld (South Africa); nickel in Zimbabwe (Africa).Lead and zinc deposits (Australia).Quite a few remarkably large concentrations of metals in Russia, China and Indonesia and uranium-bearing conglomerate at Blind River, (Canada); tin deposits in Malaysia; gold deposits at Kolar and Hutti (India).The distribution of rich concentrations appears to be at random and no particular reason could currently be given for such extraordinary enrichment within a very restricted area.Why is this randomness in distribution and exceptional enrichment confined to selected hot spots in the outer skin of planet Earth?Let us take a look at how Earth originated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Geological Society of IndiaSame topicSpace Science and Extraterrestrial LifeFrench-language works237,207