Mobility-Aware Resource Provisioning for Edge-Assisted Extended Reality Services
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a novel mobility-aware resource provisioning scheme for edge-assisted extended reality (XR) services. The goal is to minimize resource consumption while satisfying user quality of experience (QoE) requirement, which is measured by the weighted sum of visual quality, quality variation, and round-trip interaction latency. Specifically, we present a mobility model to capture both user spatial movements and XR content interaction features. Since user viewing distance and interaction time are key model parameters that affect the spatiotemporal service demand for XR content rendering and delivery at the edge, we estimate user-specific model parameters and adopt a sample average approximation method to model the relationship between user QoE and the consumption of both communication and edge computing resources. We design a coordinate descent algorithm to make resource provisioning decisions, where a deep neural network provides a valuable initial point to accelerate convergence. Simulation results demonstrate that our proposed scheme is more efficient to utilize network resources in comparison with benchmark schemes while satisfying user QoE requirements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".