MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416286361 · doi:10.1109/tmbmc.2025.3633450

The Role of Inelastic Proton Tunneling in Generating Point Mutations and Genetic Diversity in DNA

2025· article· W4416286361 on OpenAlexaff
Arash Tirandaz, Vahid Salari

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Molecular Biological and Multi-Scale Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtonQuantum tunnellingTautomerHamiltonian (control theory)QuantumDNAKinetic energyKinetic isotope effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A quantum threat to the fidelity of information transfer in transcription of DNA molecule, is the fluctuation of protons on the base pairs. Point mutations can arise when a hydrogen-bonded proton tunnels between donor and acceptor sites in DNA, transiently creating tautomeric forms that mispair during replication. Despite the elastic way of proton tunneling, we analyze inelastic proton tunneling accompanied by energy exchange with local vibrational/electronic modes and the environment. Within an open-quantum-system framework, we derive Born–Markov master equations for a two-state (double-well) Hamiltonian parameterized by hydrogen-bond geometry and environmental spectral properties. Quantum-chemical parameters are estimated by DFT (B3LYP/6311G, Gaussian09) with water as solvent. We examine temperature depen dence and kinetic isotope effects (H/D). It is shown show that inelastic tunneling can extend tautomer lifetimes and enhance mispairing probabilities. These results provide a quantitative route to connect microscopic proton dynamics with biologically relevant mutation pathways.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Molecular Biological and Multi-Scale CommunicationsSame topicDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryFrench-language works237,207