Interferometric measurement of ultra-smooth vacuum chucks for high-precision optical manufacturing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The precise measurement of discontinuous precise surfaces with numerous isolated features, such as the array of planar pads on a vacuum chuck for wafer handling, remains a significant challenge in optical metrology. Traditional phase-shifting interferometry (PSI) fails due to the phase unwrapping dilemma at the numerous discontinuous boundaries surrounding each protrusion, while other methods suffer from limited resolution, environmental sensitivity, or low efficiency. This paper presents a novel Dual-State Interferometric Profilometry (DSIP) method to overcome these limitations. The core of DSIP involves the acquisition of two interferograms: an in-focus state for capturing high-resolution XY coordinate information of the protruding pad array, and a deliberately defocused state for robust retrieval of Z-height information, bypassing the need for global phase unwrapping. Preliminary experiments on a vacuum chuck sample with an array of raised circular pads demonstrated that the DSIP method successfully reconstructed the three-dimensional topography with enhanced edge resolution and environmental robustness. This approach therefore offers an efficient and practical solution for quality control in precision manufacturing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".