MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416290316 · doi:10.29173/alr2809

The Push for Electrification and a Net-Zero Grid: Developments, Reactions, and Implications

2025· article· W4416290316 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Vivek Warrier, Jake Sadikman, Laura J. A. Scott

Bibliographic record

VenueAlberta Law Review · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistère de l'Énergie et des Ressources Naturelles
KeywordsElectrificationElectricityLegislatureBalance (ability)Energy lawElectricity generationResource (disambiguation)Mains electricity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada’s Draft Clean Electricity Regulations are poised to play a key role in achieving the federal government’s goal of achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. If implemented in their current state, the Draft Clean Electricity Regulations will place significant restrictions on electricity generation that is not low or non-emitting — restrictions which sometimes conflict with the interests and priorities of provincial governments. This article surveys the policy and legislative trends which have arisen across Canada from this federal-provincial dynamic — including concerns over electricity resource adequacy, climate goals, and grid stability. Pursuing aggressive electrification will require major shifts from the status quo, but law and policy should seek to balance the priorities of different jurisdictions rather than imposing a singular one-size-fits-all approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.839

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.009
Scholarly communication0.0090.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlberta Law ReviewSame topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207