MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416297142 · doi:10.1093/pasj/psaf109

XRISM/Resolve view of Abell 2319: Turbulence, sloshing, and ICM dynamics

2025· article· en· W4416297142 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Audard, Hisamitsu Awaki, Ralf Ballhausen, Aya Bamba, Ehud Behar, Rozenn Boissay-Malaquin, Laura Brenneman, G. V. Brown, Lía Corrales, E. Costantini, Renata Cumbee, María Díaz Trigo, Chris Done, Tadayasu Dotani, Ken Ebisawa, Megan E. Eckart, D. Eckert, S. Eguchi, Teruaki Enoto, Yuichiro Ezoe, Adam Foster, Ryuichi Fujimoto, Yutaka Fujita, Y. Fukazawa, Kotaro Fukushima, Akihiro Furuzawa, Luigi Gallo, Javier A. García, Liyi Gu, M. Guainazzi, Kouichi Hagino, Kenji Hamaguchi, Isamu Hatsukade, Katsuhiro Hayashi, Takayuki Hayashi, Natalie Hell, Edmund Hodges‐Kluck, A. E. Hornschemeier, Yuto Ichinohe, Daiki Ishi, M. Ishida, Kumi Ishikawa, Yoshitaka Ishisaki, J. S. Kaastra, T. R. Kallman, Erin Kara, Satoru Katsuda, Yoshiaki Kanemaru, Richard L. Kelley, Caroline A. Kilbourne, Shunji Kitamoto, Shōgo Kobayashi, Takayoshi Kohmura, Aya Kubota, Maurice A. Leutenegger, Michael Loewenstein, Yoshitomo Maeda, Maxim Markevitch, Hironori Matsumoto, Kyoko Matsushita, D. McCammon, B. R. McNamara, François Mernier, Eric D. Miller, J. M. Mïller, Ikuyuki Mitsuishi, Misaki Mizumoto, Tsunefumi Mizuno, Koji Mori, K. Mukai, Hiroshi Murakami, R. F. Mushotzky, Hiroshi Nakajima, Kazuhiro Nakazawa, Jan‐Uwe Ness, Kumiko Nobukawa, Masayoshi Nobukawa, Hirofumi Noda, Hirokazu Odaka, Shoji Ogawa, Anna Ogorzałek, Takashi Okajima, Naomi Ota, S. Paltani, Robert Petre, Paul P. Plucinsky, F. S. Porter, K. Pottschmidt, Kosuke Sato, Toshiki Sato, Makoto Sawada, Hiromi Seta, M. Shidatsu, A. Simionescu, Randall K. Smith, Hiromasa Suzuki, Andrew E. Szymkowiak, H. Takahashi, Mai Takeo, Toru Tamagawa, Keisuke Tamura, Takaaki Tanaka, A. Tanimoto, M. Tashiro, Y. Terada, Yuichi Terashima, Yohko Tsuboi, Masahiro Tsujimoto, Hiroshi Tsunemi, Takeshi Go Tsuru, Hiroyuki Uchida, Nagomi Uchida, Yuusuke Uchida, Hideki Uchiyama, Yoshihiro Ueda, Shiníchiro Uno, Jacco Vink, Shin Watanabe, Brian J. Williams, Satoshi Yamada, S. Yamada, Hiroya Yamaguchi, K. Yamaoka, Noriko Y. Yamasaki, M. Yamauchi, Tahir Yaqoob, T. Yoneyama, Tessei Yoshida, Mihoko Yukita, R. Seppi, Itsuki Aihara, Yuki Omiya

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooSaint Mary's University
FundersCanadian Space AgencyNagoya UniversityJapan Science and Technology CorporationScience and Technology Facilities CouncilEuropean CommissionJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationU.S. Department of EnergyJapan Science SocietyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsIntracluster mediumVelocity dispersionGalaxy clusterCold frontGalaxyTurbulenceCluster (spacecraft)Kinematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present results from XRISM/Resolve observations of the core of the galaxy cluster Abell 2319, focusing on its kinematic properties. The intracluster medium (ICM) exhibits temperatures of approximately 8 keV across the core, with a prominent cold front and a high-temperature region ($\sim$11 keV) in the north-west. The average gas velocity in the $3{^{\prime}} \times$ $4 {^{\prime}}$ region around the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG) covered by two Resolve pointings is consistent with that of the BCG to within 40 km s$^{-1}$ and we found modest average velocity dispersion of 230–250 km s$^{-1}$. On the other hand, spatially resolved spectroscopy reveals interesting variations. A blueshift of up to $\sim$230 km s$^{-1}$ is observed around the east edge of the cold front, where the gas with the lowest specific entropy is found. The region further south inside the cold front shows only a small velocity difference from the BCG; however, its velocity dispersion is enhanced to $\sim$400 km s$^{-1}$, implying the development of turbulence. These characteristics indicate that we are observing sloshing motion with some inclination angle following BCG and that gas phases with different specific entropy participate in sloshing with their own velocities, as expected from simulations. No significant evidence for a high-redshift ICM component associated with the subcluster Abell 2319B was found in the region covered by the current Resolve pointings. These results highlight the importance of sloshing and turbulence in shaping the internal structure of Abell 2319. Further deep observations are necessary to better understand the mixing and turbulent processes within the cluster.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublications of the Astronomical Society of JapanSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207