MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416297495 · doi:10.5194/ica-proc-7-23-2025

Development of an adaptive TDCP and RTK/INS tightly coupled navigation system for autonomous vehicles

2025· article· en· W4416297495 on OpenAlexaff
Shuai Guo, Hongzhou Yang, Yang Gao

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ICA · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsGNSS applicationsNavigation systemDead reckoningInertial navigation systemPower consumptionSatellite systemGlobal Positioning SystemSatellite navigationKey (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Autonomous vehicle technologies are useful for unmanned ground vehicles, mobile robotics, micro-air vehicles, and logistics which become one of the key research points in recent years. Real-Time Kinematic/Inertial Navigation System (RTK/INS) tightly coupled systems are widely used in navigation systems. They use complementary information of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) and INS to provide continuous and robust positioning and navigation solutions in various application scenarios. In this paper, we extend time-differenced carrier phase (TDCP) in RTK/INS tightly coupled algorithm to achieve low-power consumption navigation system, which can aid autonomous vehicles getting high accuracy position. In conventional RTK/INS tightly coupled systems, the pseudorange, Doppler, and carrier phase of GNSS are used to integrate with INS complementarily, which has high power consumption. Because the sampling rate of Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) is usually around hundreds of hertz and the RTK/INS tightly coupled algorithm is complicated. Unlike conventional RTK/INS tightly coupled system, this system adaptively utilizes TDCP positioning module to work independently at lower sample rates and simple structure getting high-precision position in some good condition like open-sky. RTK/INS tightly coupled module will stop work at this time to save power consumption and computation. In addition, considering the positioning error of TDCP will drifting, this system will adaptively use RTK/INS tightly coupled module to correct the drifting error of TDCP periodically to help system maintain high-precision navigation continuously. Experimental results show the positioning error of TDCP remained within relatively acceptable bounds for general navigation scenarios despite the drift. The maximum errors over 30 minutes in east, north, and up direction are around 0.333 m, −0.446 m, and 3.598 m, respectively. Besides, RMS significantly decreases with calibration by RTK/INS tightly coupled system compared to cases without calibration, which demonstrates the effectiveness of periodic correction in mitigating cumulative drift for TDCP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.204

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ICASame topicGNSS positioning and interferenceFrench-language works237,207