MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416297657 · doi:10.1128/spectrum.02335-25

Application of FreezeTB, a targeted nanopore sequencing assay, for identification of drug resistance and lineages among pulmonary tuberculosis cases in Alaska

2025· article· en· W4416297657 on OpenAlexaff
J.E. Butler, Soren George-Nichol, Ganna Kovalenko, Theresa Savidge, Yvette L Vergnetti, Catherine Pongratz, Elizabeth Bee, Andrew R. DiNardo, Alexander Kay, Anna M. Mandalakas, Eric Bortz, Tara Ness

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrobiology Spectrum · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersNational Institutes of HealthThrasher Research Fund
KeywordsPyrazinamideEthionamideEthambutolMinionTuberculosisDrug resistanceSputumNanopore sequencingWhole genome sequencing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Alaska has the highest incidence of tuberculosis (TB) in the United States, with 8% mortality while undergoing TB treatment. With a quarter of TB cases lacking sputum culture to enable drug resistance testing, FreezeTB aimed to develop tools tailored to meet the challenges in Alaska while being translatable to other settings. We designed a rapid and cost-effective laboratory workflow and software to identify drug-resistant mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis using targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS). FreezeTB, a Fast, Reliable, Economical Evaluation tool to Zap Endemic Tuberculosis, amplifies 22 gene loci associated with resistance to 16 anti-tuberculosis drugs. M. tuberculosis isolates from Alaska (2011–2024) were blinded and underwent analysis with FreezeTB, then compared with phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) and whole genome sequencing (WGS). Compared with WGS ( n = 79), FreezeTB provided the same mutations in 96% ( n = 76/79) of samples with 100% lineage agreement ( n = 79/79). Compared with pDST using Cohen’s kappa, FreezeTB had almost perfect agreement for rifampin (RIF, 0.90; n = 97/98) and ethambutol (EMB, 1.00; n = 98/98), strong agreement for isoniazid (INH, 0.80; n = 88/98), moderate agreement for ethionamide (ETO, 0.78; n = 95/98), weak agreement for streptomycin (STR, 0.56; n = 95/98), and no agreement for pyrazinamide (PZA, 0.20; n = 91/98). Using a portable nanopore sequencer, each sample cost under $30 for sequencing, which included a flow cell, a barcoding kit, a flow cell wash kit, a polymerase, and primers. FreezeTB provides a portable, 1-day laboratory and bioinformatic workflow for sequencing M. tuberculosis . Freeze TB can accurately determine mycobacterial lineage and resistance for RIF, INH, ETH, and ETO at a low cost. IMPORTANCE Globally, tuberculosis is the leading infectious cause of mortality with 10.8 million new cases and 1.25 million deaths occurring in 2024. Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) is a rapid, cost-effective method for identifying mutations in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome associated with drug resistance. FreezeTB was created to provide low-cost, portable sequencing and tNGS analysis for drug resistance. FreezeTB selectively amplifies and sequences 24 targets of the M. tuberculosis genome that cover regions the WHO has designated as containing mutations conferring drug resistance, as well as provides species confirmation and rapid lineage determination. Freeze TB is a laboratory workflow and free, open-source (OS) low dependency bioinformatic software that can be downloaded onto a computer with no further need for internet access. Using M. tuberculosis isolates from Alaska, FreezeTB provided the same mutations in 96% ( n = 76/79) of samples with 100% lineage agreement ( n = 79/79) compared with whole genome sequencing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrobiology SpectrumSame topicTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207