La declaración de la víctima de violencia de género como única prueba de cargo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El trabajo analiza la necesaria suficiencia de la declaración de la víctima de violencia de género para fundamentar una sentencia de condena cuando constituye la única prueba incriminatoria. Otorgar el valor de única prueba de cargo a la declaración de la víctima requiere encontrar un equilibrio entre dos elementos fundamentales: el derecho a la presunción de inocencia del presunto autor del delito y la expectativa de justicia de la víctima. A estos efectos, el Tribunal Supremo ha establecido unos parámetros que permiten determinar cuándo la declaración de la víctima puede adquirir el valor de prueba testifical incriminatoria: credibilidad, uniformidad, corroboración y persistencia. Ahora bien, las circunstancias particulares en que se encuentra la víctima de violencia de género obligan a una adaptación de estos requisitos establecidos con carácter general. Su análisis desde la óptica de la perspectiva de género ayuda al juez a valorar la declaración emitida minimizando el riesgo de insuficiencia probatoria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".