MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416300068 · doi:10.1101/2025.11.17.688846

The repertoire of resistance mutations selected by a <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> type IV pilus-targeting lytic bacteriophage

2025· preprint· W4416300068 on OpenAlexafffund
Veronica Tran, Hanjeong Harvey, Tanisha S. Lahane, Lori L. Burrows

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPilusLytic cycleBacteriophageVirulenceMutantPoint mutationMutationLysogenBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT P. aeruginosa type IV pili (T4P) are complex surface-exposed nanomachines used for twitching motility and biofilm formation. Exposure to bacteriophages that use T4P as their primary receptor can select for resistance mutations that reduce or abolish pilus expression. Since T4P are important virulence factors, such loss can affect pathogenicity and fitness, desirable outcomes for phage therapy. Here, we evaluated the repertoire of mutations in P. aeruginosa PAO1 exposed to the pilus-specific lytic phage PO4 and their ability to revert after removal of phage. Resistant isolates ranged from hyperpiliated to bald, but none retained twitching motility. We focused on isolates that still expressed surface pili, including one with an internal 4-amino acid duplication in the essential prepilin peptidase/methyltransferase, PilD. This duplication, distal to the predicted active sites, delayed prepilin processing. Accumulation of unprocessed subunits suppressed expression of new prepilins via inhibition of PilSR two-component system activity, restricting availability of functional subunits and conferring phage resistance. Introduction of a PilS point mutation that makes cells insensitive to accumulation of unprocessed pilins restored motility and phage susceptibility. Of the mutants tested, only those with a duplication in pilD recovered wild-type motility following removal of phage pressure, likely through slip-strand mispairing as a codon-modified variant did not revert. This work shows that resistance to pilus-specific phages does not require loss of pilus expression, and certain mutations can allow bacteria to regain pilus function. Characterizing spontaeous mutations selected by phages can help to define the function and vulnerabilities of the type IV pilus system. SIGNIFICANCE As use of phages to treat antibiotic-resistant pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa increases, it is important to understand potential outcomes of phage exposure. Most therapeutic P. aeruginosa phages use lipopolysaccharides (LPS) or T4P as primary receptors. Studying the properties of strains resistant to T4P-targeting phages can guide the design of phage cocktails to mitigate treatment resistance. We show that depending on the mutation, some phage-resistant strains can revert to wild-type sequences, emphasizing the importance of combining diverse phages to supress resurgence. By characterizing mutations that confer resistance, we can better understand whether pilus structural or regulatory components are more likely to be lost. Using phages to select for loss of pilus function represents an unbiased approach to identify new mutations in pilus-related proteins, shedding light on understudied components. Building a database of such mutations will help guide strategies to target and disarm this key P. aeruginosa virulence factor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicBacteriophages and microbial interactions→French-language works237,207→