A physics-informed machine learning (PIML) framework for projecting 21st-century permafrost extent in Northeast China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. The degradation of marginal permafrost is a sensitive indicator of climate change, with far-reaching implications on regional ecosystems, hydrology, and infrastructure. Located near the southern limit of latitudinal permafrost (SLLP) in Eastern Asia, Northeast China has experienced pronounced permafrost retreat and persistent ground warming in recent decades. This study develops a physics-informed machine learning (PIML) framework that integrates the Temperature at the Top of Permafrost (TTOP) model, observed changes in land use and land cover (LULC), and climate projections from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) to improve the understanding and prediction of permafrost dynamics in the region. Results indicate that, under the SSP5-8.5 scenario, permafrost extent may decline by more than 90 % by the end of the 21st century, primarily driven by a sharp reduction in the air freezing index (AFI), especially in high-latitude and high-elevation zones. Land use and cover changes (LUCC), particularly urban expansion and deforestation, further exacerbate ground thermal disturbances. Spatially, mountainous forested areas, such as the Da Xing’anling Mountains, exhibit relatively greater resilience to warming due to dense vegetation and complex topography that help buffer surface energy fluxes. Feature attribution analysis identifies surface temperature, snow cover duration, and vegetation as dominant drivers of permafrost stability, while Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) clustering reveals distinct degradation trajectories across different land cover types. This study highlights the complex interplay of climatic and anthropogenic factors in permafrost evolution and demonstrates the utility of integrating physical modelling with machine learning to support ecological conservation and infrastructure risk management in cold regions environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".