MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416301221 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.250807-f

Atténuer les répercussions à l’échelle mondiale des changements des politiques concernant le VIH aux États-Unis : un appel à la mobilisation et à l’action

2025· article· en· W4416301221 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Raynell Lang, M. John Gill

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Systems and Practices
Canadian institutionsAlberta Hip and Knee ClinicUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Administration (probate law)MEDLINEDrug industry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[Voir la version anglaise de l’article ici : www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.250807][1] Points clés Le 20 janvier 2025, la nouvelle administration des États-Unis a procédé au gel de tous les fonds d’aide étrangère pour une durée de 90 jours, y compris le financement du President’s

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.007
Scholarly communication0.0090.008
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicHealthcare Systems and PracticesFrench-language works237,207