MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416302533 · doi:10.24908/pocusj.v10i02.18473

Performance of POCUS for Pregnancy Evaluation using a Non-Piezoelectric Ultrasound Device in the Emergency Department

2025· article· en· W4416302533 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
H. Yun, Brandon M Wubben

Bibliographic record

VenuePOCUS Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmergency departmentUltrasoundPregnancyGestational ageThird trimesterUltrasonography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Confirmation of pregnancy location using point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is an essential component of emergency obstetric care. The accuracy of a non-piezoelectric portable ultrasound device compared to obstetric sonographer-performed ultrasonography remains uncertain. Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the practical utility of a non-piezoelectric POCUS system (Butterfly iQ+) in the emergency department, including characterizing the accuracy of findings relative to obstetric sonographer-performed ultrasound (OB-US) for obstetric and non-pregnant pelvis evaluations in the emergency department. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a Level 1 trauma center. Patients who underwent emergency physician-performed transabdominal obstetric or gynecologic POCUS examination using a non-piezoelectric transducer between November 2021 and November 2022 were included. Data from electronic medical records and ultrasound databases were abstracted. POCUS findings such as yolk sac presence, fetal heart motion, and gestational age were recorded alongside patient data including age, body mass index, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels, and ultrasound results. Descriptive statistics were analyzed using SPSS. Results: Seventy-two obstetric POCUS studies were included with an average maternal age of 29.6 ± 7.8 years. Common indications included positive pregnancy tests, abdominal/pelvic pain, and vaginal bleeding. All first-trimester intrauterine pregnancies (IUPs) diagnosed by POCUS and referred for OB-US were confirmed, with no false positives. POCUS had a sensitivity of 83.3% (95% CI 61.8-94.5) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 71.7-100) for confirmation of an IUP. The lowest hCG levels at which IUP was detected with POCUS were 6,488 without fetal heart motion and 7,098 with heart motion. The agreement between POCUS and OB-US for gestational age measurements was moderate (ICC = 0.83, 95% CI 0.0-0.99). In the second trimester, POCUS accurately detected fetal heart rate, with a strong agreement for gestational age (ICC = 0.96, 95% CI 0.43-0.99) compared to OB-US. Transabdominal POCUS also identified gynecologic conditions such as postpartum hemorrhage, and normal POCUS exams led to alternate diagnoses such as pelvic inflammatory disease and pyelonephritis. Conclusion: POCUS using a non-piezoelectric ultrasound device was able to accurately rule in first trimester IUP in the emergency department at relatively low hCG levels, with no false positive IUPs identified. During the second and third trimesters, POCUS consistently detected fetal heart motion and had good accuracy for gestational age measurements compared to OB-US. These findings suggest that POCUS using a non-piezoelectric ultrasound device is a useful tool for emergency department assessments, though further evaluation is needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.651
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePOCUS JournalSame topicNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyFrench-language works237,207