MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416306817 · doi:10.62478/ufgh7567

A Review of 6G and Next-Generation Internet: Under Blockchain Web3 Economy

2024· article· W4416306817 on OpenAlexaff
Miyoung Chong

Bibliographic record

VenueROSA Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlockchainPower (physics)Key (lock)CryptocurrencyNew economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sixth generation (6G) wireless cellular networks are anticipated to include the most recent advancements in network infrastructure and new technological discoveries.In addition to exploring more spectrum at high-frequency bands, it will bring together cutting-edge technical trends like blockchain, artificial intelligence (AI), and connected robotics.6G and Next-Generation Internet: Under Blockchain Web3 Economy by Abdeljalil Beniiche explores the human-centeredness of blockchain and Web3 economy for the 6G era.Abdeljalil Beniiche received his PhD in telecommunications from the Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS), Montréal, Canada.His research focuses on 6G networks, Tactile Internet, blockchain, information security, behavioral economics, and Society 5.0.His research findings have been published in many prestigious journals, such as IEEE Network, IEEE Wireless Communications, IEEE Communications Magazine, and IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.He has served and continues to serve on the technical program committees and is a reviewer of numerous major international conferences, journals, and magazines.Currently, he is a Security Architect in the financial industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueROSA Journal→Same topicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security→French-language works237,207→