MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416308447 · doi:10.26524/jms.15.25

Successful Entrepreneur’s: The Deal Markers

2025· article· W4416308447 on OpenAlexaff
Paul T E Cusack

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Management and Science · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Canadian institutionsSaint John Regional Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNuts and boltsKey (lock)Work (physics)Task (project management)Set (abstract data type)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Here we provide some thoughts on what separates low success entrepreneurs and those who are very successful. The answer is that those who grow a business are deal makers. They often steal their ideas for a business from a thinker, yet they gain all the reward. If you want to make it big, you need to be a deal maker. I have yet to find a book on the nuts and bolts of investing. Some people just have a “businessman in the belly”.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.353
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Management and ScienceSame topicEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207