MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416308776 · doi:10.1155/atr/5542282

Vehicle Lateral Motion Control Based on Fading Sage–Husa Kalman Filter and Robust Model Predictive Control

2025· article· en· W4416308776 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhi-Yuan Si, Feng-Xia Yuan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAnhui Provincial Department of EducationAnhui University of Science and Technology
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)CarSimKalman filterModel predictive controlTrajectoryController (irrigation)FadingNoise (video)Motion control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vehicle lateral motion control is one of the critical issues in intelligent vehicle control. We design a vehicle lateral motion controller by combining the adaptive fading Sage–Husa Kalman filter (AFSH‐KF) with the robust model predictive algorithm to address the problem of vehicle lateral motion control. Due to the influence of process and measurement noise on the estimation results, the AFSH‐KF is employed to estimate the vehicle state parameters to improve the estimation accuracy and compared with the Kalman filter (KF). Simultaneously considering the influence of the uncertainties or perturbations appearing in the feedback loop (vehicle state parameters) on vehicle lateral motion control, a robust model predictive controller (RMPC) is designed for vehicle lateral motion. The performance of the designed controller is verified by co‐simulating with MATLAB/Simulink and CarSim in double‐lane, S‐shape, and Fishhook conditions. The results show that the AFSH‐KF can effectively estimate the states (yaw rate and sideslip angle) of the vehicle. Compared to the MPC controller, the RMPC controller significantly reduced the maximum and mean square error of the lateral deviation of the vehicle tracking target trajectory at different speeds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score0.549

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicVehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207