MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416308940 · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.70177

Estimating scale‐dependent covariate responses using two‐dimensional diffusion derived from the stochastic partial differential equation method

2025· article· en· W4416308940 on OpenAlexaff
Max Lindmark, Sean C. Anderson, James T. Thorson

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in Ecology and Evolution · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersSvenska Forskningsrådet Formas
KeywordsPointwiseCovariateOperator (biology)Sampling (signal processing)Partial differential equationScalingFunctional data analysisDiffusionHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Species distribution models (SDMs) are widely used to standardize spatially unbalanced data, project climate impacts and identify habitat for conservation. SDMs typically estimate the impact of local environmental conditions by estimating a dome‐shaped or non‐parametric ‘environmental response function’. However, ecological responses often integrate across local habitat conditions, such that species density depends on habitat at the location of sampling but also at nearby locations. To address this, we extend methods from the stochastic partial differential equation (SPDE) method that is widely used in INLA, which approximates spatial correlations based on local diffusion over a finite‐element mesh (FEM). We specifically introduce the sparse inverse‐diffusion operator on a FEM and apply this operator to covariates to efficiently calculate a spatially weighted average of local habitat that is then passed through pointwise basis expansion to predict species densities. We show that this operator has several useful properties, that is conservation of mass, efficient scaling of computational time with spatial resolution, and invariance to linear (scale and offset) transformations of covariates. We test this covariate‐diffusion method using a simulation experiment and show that it can correctly recover a non‐local environmental response while collapsing to a local (pointwise) response when warranted. We apply it to monitoring data for 25 bottom‐associated fishes in the eastern Bering Sea and 20 bird species in the western United States. This application confirms that non‐local responses in the eastern Bering Sea case study are parsimonious for 26 species–maturity combinations, while 18 collapse to the pointwise method. Estimates suggest that some species–maturity combinations avoid proximity to the continental slope, beyond what is predicted by local bathymetry in isolation. By contrast, in four of the 20 bird species the diffused human population density covariate is more parsimonious than the original covariate. The covariate‐diffusion method introduced here constitutes a fast and efficient approach to modelling non‐local covariate effects. This flexible method may be useful in cases when covariates influence nearby population densities, for instance due to movement of the sampled species or its important biological or physical drivers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.555
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods in Ecology and EvolutionSame topicSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeFrench-language works237,207