Continental Alkaline Maginatism <i>vis-a-vis</i> the Indian Subcontinent: A Documentary Profile
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Archaean alkaline magmatism, constituting one of the rare global phenomena, was hitherto recorded only from the Australian and North American (Canada and Greenland) continents With the recently reported occurrence of a late Archaean syenite pluton at Koppa] in the eastern Dharwar craton of India, the Asian continent has also entered into the record for hosting such a rare magmatic event Worldwide, alkaline magmatism was again sparsely manifested during Palaeoproterozoic time and the reported occurrence of Palaeoproterozoic syenrte and carbonatite bodies from certain parts of India therefore assumes considerable significance The Indian subcontinent was the target of alkaline-carbonatite magmatic activities during Mesoproterozoic, Neopioterozoic, Cretaceous and Eocene periods The compositional diversity of continental alkaline magnatism, as manifested in the Indian subcontinent during different geological times, has been documented here to provide a wider perspective for investigating the Indian alkaline rocks in future
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".