MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416309389 · doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2025.102688

Combined influence of future land use change and spatially distributed seasonal climatic variations on surface hydrology

2025· article· en· W4416309389 on OpenAlexaff
Manish Ratna Bhusal, V. M. Jayasooriya, Shobha Muthukumaran

Bibliographic record

VenueUrban Climate · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStreamflowSurface runoffClimate changeLand useLand use, land-use change and forestryHydrology (agriculture)Seasonality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study evaluated the isolated and combined impacts of land use change and climate change on built runoff and streamflow variation using future climatic projections under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios. Seasonal and annual downscaled climate data were integrated into the Sacramento rainfall-runoff model within eWater Source to adjust daily rainfall inputs and to assess the influence of the temporal resolution of future rainfall data. The results indicated a significant increase in built runoff and streamflow due to land use change. Streamflow predictions under seasonal projections showed increase of 62.7 % (RCP4.5) and 42.8 % (RCP8.5), while annual projections yielded lower increase of 40.2 % (RCP4.5) and 30.3 % (RCP8.5) combined with land use change. These results suggest that annual projections underestimated streamflow and built runoff compared to seasonal data. Streamflow patterns are strongly influenced by the integration of seasonal rainfall projections exhibiting a significant bias (> ±20 %) under the RCP4.5 scenario, particularly when combined with land use change. Furthermore, predicted winter streamflow variation showed a substantial bias, either with or without the land use change (−45.5 % and −44.7 % respectively). This is attributed to the higher variability of rainfall patterns in these seasons, which is smoothed when using rainfall data derived from annual projections. Overall results indicate that climate change predominantly alters streamflow patterns, while land use change primarily impacts its volume. This study highlighted the dominant role of land use change and emphasizes the importance of incorporating different temporal resolution climatic data in hydrological modelling. • Combined impacts of land use and climate change on surface hydrology. • Seasonal projections resulted in higher built runoff and streamflow than annual projections. • Seasonal projections captured extreme wet and dry periods more effectively. • Intra annual fluctuations in streamflow and runoff are more sensitive to climate change. • Higher mitigation of climate change impacts at coarser temporal resolution of rainfall data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.420

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUrban ClimateSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207