MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416310148 · doi:10.3390/f16111738

Mixed-Species Afforestation Increases Deep Soil Water Consumption on the Semi-Arid Loess Plateau

2025· article· en· W4416310148 on OpenAlexaff
Tingfang Meng, Hao Feng, Wenjie Wu, Guangjie Chen, Min Li, Bingcheng Si, Qin’ge Dong

Bibliographic record

VenueForests · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNatural Science Foundation of Henan ProvinceNatural Science Foundation of Hunan ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRobiniaPlatycladusSoil waterAfforestationWater contentHippophae rhamnoidesLoess plateauLoessSoil horizon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the semi-arid Loess Plateau of China, afforestation frequently leads to soil water depletion, threatening ecosystem sustainability. Although mixed-species plantations are encouraged to enhance resource use efficiency, their effects on deep soil water and root distribution strategies remain unclear. This study compared soil water content (SWC), deep soil water deficit (SWD), and fine root distribution in pure and mixed plantations of Robinia pseudoacacia, Platycladus orientalis, and Hippophae rhamnoides to assess whether species mixing intensifies consumption for deep soil water. Soil moisture and root samples were collected with a maximum depth of 20 m across five stand types in August 2018 and during the 2019 growing season. Results showed that mixed stands exhibited shallower water depletion depth and lower SWC below 2 m than pure stands, but a more severe deep soil water deficit, with observed SWD exceeding the expected values by 12% in the R. pseudoacacia-P. orientalis mixture (MRP) and 22% in the H. rhamnoides-P. orientalis mixture (MHP), indicating intensified water consumption below 2 m. In the MRP, the maximum rooting depth was shallower than in the corresponding pure stands. Within the mixture, species-specific root plasticity was observed: the normalized fine root length density (FRLD) of P. orientalis was four times greater in mixture than in pure stand, whereas that of R. pseudoacacia was 62% lower, suggesting divergent foraging strategies. Correlation analyses indicated that SWC was differently associated with root traits between pure and mixed stands, with relationships varying by soil depth. Mixed-effects models confirmed that both plantation type and soil depth significantly influenced FRLD and Root dry weight density (RDWD), while specific root length (SRL) was mainly affected by plantation type and its interaction with depth. These findings demonstrated that mixed-species afforestation intensifies deep soil water competition. Therefore, sustainable management should prioritize the selection of species with complementary root foraging strategies and the optimization of planting densities in semi-arid regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.931

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueForestsSame topicAgroforestry and silvopastoral systemsFrench-language works237,207