MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416314036 · doi:10.17491/jgsi/2002/600103

Geochemical and Isotopic Constraints of Neoarchaean Fossil Plume for Evolution of Volcanic Rocks of Sandur Greenstone Belt, India

2002· article· en· W4416314036 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S. M. Naqvi, C. Manikyamba, T. Gnaneshwar Rao, D. V. Subba Rao, M. Ram Mohan, D. Srinivasa Sarma

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Geological Society of India · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUltramafic rockSchistGreenschistPillow lavaMetamorphic faciesVolcanic rockTerrigenous sediment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Metavolcanics of 20 km wide Sultanpura volcanic block of the Neoarchaean Sandur (greenstone) schist belt are divided into tholeiitic basalts, high Mg basalts, Al-depleted and Al-undepletcd komatiitic ultramafic schists. Metabasalts are metamorphosed to amphibolite facies, but still preserve their pillow structures. Ultramafic komatiitic rocks are transformed to actinolite-tremolite schists with no recognizable original textures or mineralogy. Mctabasalts and ultramafic komatiitic schists are interbedded with thin layers of sulphidic banded iron formations, argillaceous carbonate rocks and carbon phyllites that are interpreted as metamorphosed pelagic sediments of the deep ocean. No terrigenous sediments are found in Sultanpura block indicating that eruption of these submarine volcanic rocks took place in the deeper part of the ocean, away from the western and eastern shelf parts of the Sandur belt, where terrigenous sediments are abundant. Sultanpura block in its west and east is discordantly bounded by thrust, subduction complex and shelf facies sediments. These observations are interpreted to indicate that Sultanpura block is a telescoped proto-oceanic part between the two shelves and island are complexes. MgO of metavolcanic rocks varies from 6 to 30%, with a gap between 16 to 22%. Al2O3/TiO2 shows characteristic variation for tholeiites (10-15), high Mg basalts (13-21), Al-undepleted ultramafic komatiitic schists (9-23) and Al-depleted ultramafic komatiitic schists (11-20). CaO/Al2O3 of tholeiites and high Mg basalts is ~1, whereas for the ultramafic komatiitic schists, this ratio exhibits a range between 0.5 to 2, as a consequence of CaO mobility. REE, HFSE and 143Nd/144Nd data from Sultanpura volcanic rocks vary between CHUR (Chondrite Uniform Reservoir), primitive mantle and depleted mantle, but appear to be derived from primitive mantle and have been probably contaminated by continental crust. Although the abundance of REE varies from 2 to 12 chondrite, the patterns are smooth and flat with small negative or positive Eu anomalies as artifacts of alteration. Generally positive, but in few samples negative Nb anomalies are also found, with (Ce/Sm)N and (Gd/Yb)N being near chondritic. Ti/V, Ti/Zr, Zr/Y, Sc/Y, Nb/La, Nb/Th, Nb/U, MgO/TiO2, MgO/FeO and Al2O3/TiO2 also for many samples are near chondritic, εNd=+0.8649±0.00024 resembling CHUR. Th/Nb, Nb/U and some other ratios are near to those of Ontong Java and Gorgana plateaus (0.80 Ga) and the tholeiite-komatiitic sequence found in 2.7 Ga Southern volcanic zone, Abitibi belt of Canada and 2.1 Ga Birimian belt of West Africa. Collectively, these data indicate that a mantle plume, derived from an enriched mantle, possibly played an important role in the oceanic volcanic sequence of Sultanpura block. Some of the HFSE follow the olivine control line, whereas other elements following the olivine control line define a narrow array tube. Formation of such array tubes on the plots of some HFSE elements and their ratios, and the scatters of HFSE/REE ratios, probably suggest dynamic melting of the plume during ascent. Entrenchment, mixing of Archaean ocean ridge basalts (AORB), crustal contamination and subduction of such a plume-fed slab may have generated the compositional heterogeneities observed in the Sultanpura metavolcanic rocks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Geological Society of IndiaSame topicGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisFrench-language works237,207