MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416333736 · doi:10.1093/hgs/dcaf046

<i>None Is Too Many: Canada and the Jews of Europe, 1933–1948</i> , 40th anniversary edition, Irving Abella and Harold Troper

2025· article· en· W4416333736 on OpenAlexaffabout
Robert J. Brym

Bibliographic record

VenueHolocaust and Genocide Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish Identity and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
Keywordsnot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

None Is Too Many is one of the few historical works that not only contributes substantially to the story of a country's development, but also becomes part of a country's official ideology. It recounts Canada's refusal to admit more than a few thousand Jewish refugees between 1933 and 1948, making it one of the countries that was least receptive to rescuing Jews from Europe's hell. According to Irving Abella and Harold Troper, Canada's reluctance to accept more Jewish refugees stemmed from the following circumstances. In 1941, about 50 percent of Canadians were of British origin and 30 percent of French origin. Quebec's powerful Roman Catholic Church represented Jews as a corrupting modernist force of dishonest, parasitical, ideologically destructive, “money-grubbing, rootless, and contemptuous deniers of Christ's divinity,” spreading fear about the potential for Jews to destroy French Canadian morality and culture. Popular journals in French, including Le Devoir, similarly demonized Jews and urged readers not to buy from Jewish businesses: “Together, Quebec Church leaders, nationalist politicians, and the social elite united not only in support of a boycott of Jewish-owned businesses, but also in efforts to keep Jews out of the public square, and, above all, to bar Canada's door to the further admission of Jews” (p. xiv). Prior to the Second World War in English-speaking Canada, Jews were prevented from fully participating in public life with communities tolerating “discrimination on account of origin, race, and religion” in housing and in employment, including in banking, federal and public services, insurance companies, industrial companies, and department stores. During this era, there were very few Jewish teachers and no Jewish school principals. Universities also limited Jewish hiring and admissions. In the field of health care, “Jewish doctors, even Canadian trained, rarely received hospital appointments.” For some Jews working in nursing, architecture, and engineering, changing one's surname was the only route to obtain employment (pp. xv–xvi). In contrast, Canadian Jews formed a small community of about 170,000. Mainly working-class and petit bourgeois immigrants, they were too few and too poorly organized to mount an effective pro-immigration campaign on behalf of their European coreligionists. None Is Too Many is a thorough and convincing chronological account of the interplay of these forces and their effects on Canadian immigration policy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.011
Science and technology studies0.0140.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueHolocaust and Genocide StudiesSame topicJewish Identity and SocietyFrench-language works237,207