MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416336452 · doi:10.37185/lns.1.1.982

Intra-articular Hyaluronic Acid with Versus without Corticosteroids for Knee Osteoarthritis Among Patients Presenting at Dr. Ziauddin Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2025· article· en· W4416336452 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Saad Shahid, Naseem Munshi, Athar Muniruddin Siddiqui, Uzma Azmatullah, Arham Azizi

Bibliographic record

VenueLife and Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyaluronic acidOsteoarthritisWOMACCorticosteroidRetrospective cohort studyViscosupplementationVisual analogue scale

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections with and without addedcorticosteroid in patients with knee osteoarthritis.Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.Place and Duration of Study: This study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dr. ZiauddinHospital (North Nazimabad Campus) in Karachi, Pakistan from 1st February 2025 to 30th April 2025.Methods: A total of 150 adults (aged 30–70) with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis who received a single intraarticular knee injection were identified: 75 patients received a 6 mL injection of cross-linked sodiumhyaluronate alone, and 75 patients received 6 mL of the same hyaluronic acid combined with 8g triamcinolonehexacetonide. Pain was assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline and at 3, 12, and 24 weeks postinjection. Knee symptoms and function were evaluated using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at baseline and 12 weeks. SPSS version 23 was used for data analysis.Results: At 3 weeks, mean VAS pain was 4.35 in the hyaluronic acid and corticosteroid group vs 5.97 in thehyaluronic acid group (P=0.001). This advantage persisted at 12 weeks (P=0.001) and 24 weeks (P=0.001). Bothgroups showed significant improvement from baseline in WOMAC scores at 12 weeks. WOMAC pain decreasedby 0.57 points in hyaluronic acid and corticosteroid vs 0.44 in hyaluronic acid only (P=0.001 for within-groupimprovements), and WOMAC function scores improved by 7.07 vs 5.46 points, respectively (both P=0.001within-group).Conclusion: Hyaluronic acid and corticosteroid co-injection can be a valuable option for more rapid symptomrelief, while hyaluronic acid alone remains beneficial for longer-term management. How to cite this: Shahid S, Munshi N, Siddiqui AM, Azmatullah U, Azizi A, Aziz A. Intra-articular Hyaluronic Acid with Versus without Corticosteroids for Knee Osteoarthritis Among Patients Presenting at Dr. Ziauddin Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Life and Science. 2025; 6(4): 448-454. doi: http://doi.org/10.37185/LnS.1.1.982

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLife and ScienceSame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207