MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416336986 · doi:10.1186/s12885-025-15085-w

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) or temozolomide for 1p/19q Co-deleted anaplastic oligodendroglioma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

2025· article· en· W4416336986 on OpenAlexaff
María Gómez Santos Gómez Santos, Natasha Maranhão Vieira Rodrigues, Franceliny Gibram, Felipe Araújo Gouhie, Ana Carolina Pinheiro Campos, Danielle V. Assis, Cleiton Formentin, Olavo Feher, Alice Roxo Nobre de Souza e Silva, Samir Abdallah Hanna, Caroline Chung, Caroline Chaul Barbosa, Fábio Ynoe de Moraes, Marcos Vinícius Calfat Maldaun

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Cancer · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemozolomideVincristineSurgical oncologyChemoradiotherapyRadiation therapyAnaplastic astrocytomaAdjuvantAdjuvant chemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Anaplastic oligodendrogliomas are rare diffuse gliomas. Although radiotherapy (RT) combined with procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) has been the historical standard, temozolomide (TMZ) has been increasingly used. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of RT combined with PCV versus RT combined with TMZ in adult with anaplastic oligodendroglioma. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted up to March 2025. Eligible studies included patients with 1p/19q-codeleted anaplastic oligodendroglioma treated with RT + PCV, RT + TMZ, or RT alone. Studies comparing RT alone to RT + PCV or RT + TMZ were used to create indirect comparisons, with RT as a common comparator. A frequentist network meta-analysis with a random-effects model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2 and ROBINS-I. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251012169). No funding was received. RESULTS: Eight studies comprising 2,416 patients were included. The network meta-analysis, compared with RT alone, RT + PCV significantly improved OS (HR: 0.617; 95% CI 0.465-0.819; p = 0.0009), and PFS (HR: 0.547; 95% CI 0.415-0.721; p < 0.0001), while RT + TMZ showed a trend toward improved OS (HR: 0.913; 95% CI 0.666-1.252; p = 0.421) and PFS (HR: 1.270; 95% CI 0.870-1.855; p = 0.215), without statistical significance. In the comparison between RT + PCV and RT + TMZ, RT + PCV demonstrated superior OS (HR: 0.676; 95% CI, 0.585-0.781; p < 0.0001) and better PFS (HR: 0.431; 95% CI, 0.325-0.570; p < 0.0001). Limitations include the small number of randomized trials directly comparing key outcomes, and the fact that most studies predated current molecular diagnostic criteria, with toxicity data often reported in heterogeneous populations. CONCLUSION: In patients with anaplastic oligodendroglioma, RT combined with PCV provides superior survival outcomes compared to radiotherapy combined with TMZ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.917

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC CancerSame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207