MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transmission-Level Disaggregation of Distributed PV Power Using Data-Driven Methods

2025· article· W4416342569 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsIndependent Electricity System OperatorUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisibilityPhotovoltaic systemCover (algebra)Focus (optics)Transmission (telecommunications)Electric power systemPower (physics)Electric power transmissionPower transmission

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growing integration of Photovoltaic (PV) systems into distribution networks has limited visibility for system operators. Most small-scale PV installations, particularly behind-the-meter systems, are not monitored, making them effectively invisible to utilities [1]. Unregistered rooftop installations or decommissioned systems that may not be recorded can lead to significant gaps in utilities’ records, as observed through interactions with utility partners. This lack of visibility impedes the ability of network operators to ensure proper power flow, system operation, and efficient management of local energy resources. This highlights the need for improved methodologies to gauge and integrate these systems more effectively, especially at the transmission feeder level, where feeders cover large geographic areas [2], which is the main focus of the current poster.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.664
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimal Power Flow DistributionFrench-language works237,207