MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416344098 · doi:10.1101/2025.11.17.688884

Real-time spatial evolution of the fMRI response to photobiomodulation in the healthy human brain

2025· preprint· W4416344098 on OpenAlexaff
Joanna X Chen, Hannah Van Lankveld, Xiaole Zhong, J. Jean Chen

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicLaser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
Canadian institutionsBaycrest HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman brainBrain mappingNeuroimagingTranscranial magnetic stimulationNeural activityBrain activity and meditationCognitionDynamics (music)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Photobiomodulation (PBM) is a non-invasive therapeutic technique that uses low-level near-infrared light to influence mitochondrial metabolism and stimulate neural function. While PBM is increasingly used to improve cognitive and clinical outcomes, its in vivo physiological mechanisms in humans remain poorly characterized. In this study, we used BOLD-fMRI to investigate and quantify the temporal and spatial dynamics of transcranial PBM-induced brain activity in young, healthy adults, while incorporating multiple stimulation parameters (wavelength, irradiance, frequency) and transcranial delivery sites (right forehead and intranasal). A time-lagged correlation analysis revealed distinct spatiotemporal patterns of positive and negative BOLD responses that evolved over tens of seconds across both cortical surface and subcortical regions during stimulation. Notably, these effects propagated across brain regions that are potentially mediated by functional networks, were dose-dependent, and were modulated by individual skin tone. This work provides the first real-time, whole-brain mapping of PBM-induced hemodynamic changes in humans, offering new insights into dose-response characteristics and delivery-specific dynamics underlying PBM neurophysiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicLaser Applications in Dentistry and MedicineFrench-language works237,207