MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416344606 · doi:10.24908/pocusj.v10i02.19399

POCUS Diagnosis of Bacterial Lymphadenitis Later Determined to be Cat Scratch Disease: A Unique Presentation and Review

2025· article· en· W4416344606 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alec P. Tolentino, Stanley Wojtas, Charlene A. Audette, E Meyer, Zachary W. Binder

Bibliographic record

VenuePOCUS Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBartonella species infections research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVascularityDifferential diagnosisPresentation (obstetrics)Lymphatic systemEmergency departmentLymphCervical lymphadenopathyInguinal lymphadenopathy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acute lymphadenopathy has a wide range of possible etiologies, ranging from self-limiting viral infections to life-threatening malignancy. Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) can play a crucial role in identifying lymphadenopathy and ruling out other potential causes of soft tissue swelling, such as hernias, abscesses, and malignancies. Furthermore, POCUS enables the characterization of lymphadenopathy by evaluating the size, shape, echogenicity, and vascularity of the involved lymph nodes, thereby helping to identify the presence and extent of pathology. When performed at the time of initial presentation, POCUS can narrow the differential diagnosis and guide appropriate work-up and management. We present a case of a teenage male evaluated in the pediatric emergency department for acute bilateral inguinal swelling, in which POCUS identified lymphadenopathy and guided the evaluation of a presumed infectious process, ultimately determined to be caused by cat scratch disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePOCUS JournalSame topicBartonella species infections researchFrench-language works237,207