MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416345117 · doi:10.1016/j.jpra.2025.11.008

Dissecting the details: A case-based anatomical walkthrough of the antegrade posterior interosseous artery flap for elbow reconstruction

2025· article· en· W4416345117 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJPRAS Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Canadian institutionsSaint John Regional HospitalUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElbowPosterior interosseous nerveUlnar nerveWristSoft tissueMedian nerveFree flap

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pedicled posterior interosseous artery flap is a reliable and effective option for reconstructing soft tissue defects in the upper extremity. Commonly described in a retrograde fashion for distal defects, its antegrade counterpart is less frequently reported, particularly in relation to elbow reconstructions. Additionally, there are few and less detailed descriptions on how to safely and correctly identify the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) in the harvest. The current case describes the use of the pedicled antegrade posterior interosseous artery flap to resurface a complex elbow wound with exposed triceps tendon, exposed ulnar nerve and an open elbow joint. We present a detailed step-by-step harvest with the additional anatomical description of the topography of the PIN branches relative to the PIA pedicle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.678
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it