MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416345140 · doi:10.1016/j.rechem.2025.102887

Investigating microbial interactions in dual chamber microbial fuel cells using a hybrid substrate of synthetic wastewater and human urine

2025· article· en· W4416345140 on OpenAlex
Soubhagya Nayak, Sudipa Bhadra, Vijaya Raghavan, Makarand M. Ghangrekar, Surajbhan Sevda

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersScheme for Promotion of Academic and Research Collaboration
KeywordsMicrobial fuel cellWastewaterBiofilmMicrobial population biologyCyclic voltammetrySewage treatmentPopulationElectrochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microbial fuel cells (MFC) are emerging as a sustainable technology for wastewater treatment, utilizing microbial communities to transform waste substrates into valuable resources. The electrochemical behavior and dynamics of the microbial community inhabiting MFCs that utilize synthetic wastewater mixed with real human urine as anolyte have not been explored much. In this study electrochemical techniques, such as cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were harnessed to investigate the electrochemical performance and microbial population dynamics through 16 s metagenomic sequencing. Synthetic wastewater and varying dilutions of real human urine served as an anolyte, while acidic water(pH -2) as a catholyte across different batches of MFC. Three distinct batches were operated with anolytes that had urine concentrations of 20 %, 50 %, and 75 %, respectively. The CV demonstrated that when bacteria proliferate and biofilm develops gradually, the voltammograms region under the curve expands, a phenomenon that can be correlated to the anode's increasing capacitance. According to EIS assessments, the development of bacteria across the surface of the anode substantially reduces the impedance. The findings demonstrate that human urine contributes to essential ions and organic compounds, promoting microbial diversity and enhancing electron transfer processes. • MFCs use synthetic wastewater and human urine as mixed substrates for efficient, sustainable wastewater treatment. • CV and EIS were employed to study microbial activity and electron transfer dynamics. • Batch experiments using 20 %, 50 %, and 75 % urine concentrations showed marked differences in biofilm formation and electrochemical performance. • Higher urine concentration enhanced microbial diversity, strengthened biofilm formation, and lowered anode impedance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.564

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it