Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X SMA Swasta Sinar Pancasila Betun
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to determine the effect of the application of the Discovery Learning learning model on student learning outcomes in Geography class X at Sinar Pancasila Betun Private High School. The study used an experimental method with a pretest-posttest control group design. The study population was all students of class X, with a purposive sampling technique consisting of an experimental class and a control class. The research instrument was a multiple-choice learning outcome test that had been tested for validity and reliability. The results showed a significant increase in learning outcomes in the experimental class after the application of the Discovery Learning learning model. The average posttest score of the experimental class was 74.0236, higher than the control class of 19.2045. Hypothesis testing using the t-test showed that the calculated t value > t table at a significance level of 5%, so the alternative hypothesis was accepted. This means that there is a positive effect of the use of the Discovery Learning learning model on student learning outcomes. Based on these findings, it is concluded that the Discovery Learning learning model is effective for improving student learning outcomes in Geography learning and can be used as an alternative innovative learning strategy in schools.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it