MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416353005 · doi:10.1353/cel.2025.a974913

Leabhar Ua Maine as an early witness to Acallam na senórach

2025· article· en· W4416353005 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kevin Murray

Bibliographic record

VenueNorth American journal of Celtic studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies of British Isles
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWitnessContext (archaeology)NarrativeDocumentary evidenceQuarter (Canadian coin)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

abstract: From the information contained in 'Ware's Index', we know that the famous Roscommon codex, Leabhar Ua Maine (RIA MS D ii 1 [1225]), once contained a copy of Acallam na senórach 'The colloquy of the ancients', the premier medieval fíanaigecht tale. This is particularly significant as it seems probable that the Acallam was composed in the Augustinian house of canons in Roscommon town (not far from where Leabhar Ua Maine was written) and also because there is no surviving manuscript containing this extended narrative that pre-dates this vellum. Furthermore, a number of incidents in Acallam na senórach have an added significance in an Uí Maine context which might be important in better understanding some of the episodes detailed within the text.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score0.935

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorth American journal of Celtic studiesSame topicHistorical Studies of British IslesFrench-language works237,207