MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416354310 · doi:10.1002/cpz1.70254

A Novel Image‐Based Approach for Analyzing Neutrophil Chemotaxis Using a Boyden Chamber Assay

2025· article· en· W4416354310 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Umar, Gurpreet Kaur Aulakh

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Protocols · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemotaxisInflammationImmune systemCell migrationWound healingCellProcess (computing)Innate immune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chemotaxis is a fundamental biological process in which cells such as leukocytes migrate directionally from one site to another in response to a chemical gradient. This process of cellular migration is critical for execution of appropriate physiological responses to inflammation, as observed during immune defense and wound healing responses. Neutrophils being the first responders to the sites of infection or injury are one such type of cells. A neutrophil chemotaxis assay is a commonly used laboratory technique used to measure the directed movement of neutrophils toward a chemical signal termed a chemoattractant. It is used in immunology and inflammation research to study directed immune cell migration and to assess the effects of various molecules on cell migration. When studying neutrophil chemotaxis, current methods rely on counts of cells that have migrated across a membrane or substrate and observation of the migrated cells under a microscope. While useful, this approach fails to account for cells that have been activated but remain adherent to the substrate or cells that are in the intermediate stages of transmigration. Such limitations restrict the scope of information obtained and may lead to incomplete interpretations of neutrophil chemotaxis. To address this, we developed a new image analysis method that directly addresses the membrane in a chemotaxis chamber called the Boyden chamber. This improved technique allows quantification of neutrophils that have migrated as well as those that are adherent or actively transmigrating. By including all three stages of neutrophil movement, it provides a more comprehensive and physiologically relevant understanding of chemotaxis. It offers researchers a powerful tool to dissect the dynamics of immune cell behavior with greater sensitivity and accuracy, paving the way for deeper insights into immune responses and potential therapeutic interventions in inflammatory diseases. © 2025 The Author(s). Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Assay for the migration of bone marrow-derived neutrophils using the Boyden chamber Basic Protocol 2: Analysis of adherent, transmigrating, and transmigrated cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent ProtocolsSame topicCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchFrench-language works237,207