MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416354374 · doi:10.3390/dna5040055

The Multiple DNA-Associated Roles of ASPM and Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation as a Unifying Mechanism of Function

2025· article· en· W4416354374 on OpenAlexafffund
Lori Borgal

Bibliographic record

VenueDNA · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsMount Saint Vincent University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaResearch Nova ScotiaRoyal SocietyCanada Foundation for InnovationUniversity of ExeterMount Saint Vincent University
KeywordsTranscription factorMechanism (biology)MitosisContext (archaeology)Function (biology)Transcription (linguistics)InterphaseDNA replication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Best known as an organizer of the mitotic spindle, the protein product of the human assembly factor for spindle microtubules (ASPM) gene has recently been shown to function in the interphase nucleus during multiple DNA-associated processes, including BRCA1-mediated DNA DSB repair, ATR-CHK1 activation during replication stress, and transcription regulation alongside the transcription factor FOXM1. In this review, we provide an overview of these DNA-related roles of ASPM. Additionally, we suggest the facilitation of liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) as a potential unifying mechanism underlying ASPM function. We also consider the implications of LLPS and ASPM dysfunction in disease, and highlight the impact of cellular context including cell cycle phase-dependent post-translational protein modifications and ion concentrations. An increased understanding of LLPS in ASPM function relevant to genome stability may enable future drug discovery for diseases such as cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDNA→Same topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics→French-language works237,207→