MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416355950 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c06053

Nanoplastics and the Role of the Corona in the Biological Responses of <i>Daphnia magna</i>

2025· article· en· W4416355950 on OpenAlexafffund
Ana C. Quevedo, Owen Armstrong, Korin E. Wheeler, Kathryn Riley, Nathalie Tufenkji

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution
Canadian institutionsUnited Nations University Institute for Water, Environment, and HealthMcGill University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesMcGill UniversityKillam TrustsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCamille and Henry Dreyfus Foundation
KeywordsBiomoleculeCatalaseSuperoxide dismutaseOxidative stressGlutathioneAntioxidantReactive oxygen speciesInternalization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the aquatic environment, organisms predominantly interact with nanoplastics coated with environmental biomolecules rather than with bare plastics. This study investigates the biological response of Daphnia magna neonates to bare and biomolecule-coated nanoplastics over 24 and 48 h. The commercially available fetal bovine serum (FBS), biomolecules collected from D. magna secretions (DSB), and algae biomolecules (AB), were used to coat (hard corona) 20 nm fluorescent nanoplastics. The results show that neonate exposure to both bare and coated nanoplastics resulted in the production of biomolecules by the neonates, which interacted with the nanoplastic surface, uniquely altering their properties through binding and exchange of biomolecules, affecting their internalization and toxicity. Neonates exposed to bare nanoplastics exhibited the highest mortality rates, while nanoplastics coated with FBS, DSB, and AB resulted in lower mortality, suggesting that corona composition significantly influences nanoplastic toxicity. Confocal microscopy revealed the highest internalization for the bare, DSB, and AB coated nanoplastics compared to the FBS coated nanoplastics. Swimming behavior was mostly affected by the bare nanoplastics compared to the corona-coated nanoplastics. The antioxidant defense mechanisms, including glutathione S-transferase (GST), catalase (CAT), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were analyzed in D. magnahomogenates exposed to both bare and protein-coated nanoplastics, in order to better understand the overall oxidative stress responses in neonates. Results demonstrated higher enzyme activities at 24 h of exposure to all nanoplastics, particularly for SOD and GST. At 48 h, CAT activity increased for all nanoplastics, indicating sustained oxidative stress and activation of mechanisms to neutralize ROS and mitigate cellular damage. This study underscores the critical role of the coronas in modulating nanoplastic toxicity, advocating for their consideration in toxicological risk assessments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B→Same topicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution→French-language works237,207→