The Qingzhen reaction, a fine‐grained mineral assemblage associated with djerfisherite in some <scp>EH3</scp> chondrites: Alteration on the <scp>EH</scp> parent body
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Enstatite chondrites formed under extremely reducing conditions in the protoplanetary disk. They are derived from two or more parent bodies, EH and EL, and both EH and EL groups contain petrologic type 3–6 samples. The rare lithophile‐ and halogen‐bearing sulfide, djerfisherite, occurs in low abundance in enstatite chondrites, most frequently in the EH3 chondrites. In some EH3 chondrites, but not in EL chondrites, djerfisherite is associated with a fine‐grained mineral assemblage, termed the “Qingzhen Reaction,” which has previously been interpreted as an alteration product of djerfisherite. The Qingzhen Reaction is notable as perhaps the only record of fluid‐mediated alteration on the EH parent body. In this study, we undertook a high‐resolution chemical and mineralogical analysis of the Qingzhen Reaction and its djerfisherite host, in order to determine its composition, relationship to djerfisherite and its formation environment. We show that the Qingzhen Reaction is an alteration product of djerfisherite, predominantly comprised of porous troilite with remnant djerfisherite. Trace quantities of halite and (likely) sphalerite are also present. We suggest that the Qingzhen Reaction formed by the interaction of an anhydrous fluid with djerfisherite on the EH parent body.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".