MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416359698 · doi:10.7202/1121509ar

Importer pour mieux régner

2024· article· fr· W4416359698 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
William Riguelle

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d histoire de l Amérique française · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicNew Caledonia Indigenous Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnimal productionStatistical analysisOrder (exchange)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Malgré les ressources fauniques apparemment inépuisables recensées dans les récits de voyage de la Nouvelle-France, les colons français des 17 e et 18 e siècle apportent ou importent au Canada des chevaux, des vaches, des cochons ou des chats européens. Quels rôles ces animaux jouent-ils dans le développement de la colonie et dans l’établissement d’une « Nouvelle-France » ? S’appuyant sur la correspondance des administrateurs coloniaux, les récits de voyage et les rapports archéozoologiques, cet article examine le rôle des animaux d’importation et montre comment ils s’inscrivent dans la recréation d’un environnement et d’une culture identifiables à la France.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d histoire de l Amérique françaiseSame topicNew Caledonia Indigenous StudiesFrench-language works237,207