Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans l’hagiographie qu’il consacre à saint Lydwine de Schiedam, Huysmans a placé la peau au cœur d’un procès contradictoire, qui la voue à la disparition brutale tout en en faisant un médiateur privilégié entre la sainte et la communauté des croyants. Conformément à la vocation édifiante de l’hagiographie, il réinscrit ainsi dans le registre de l’anatomie la « vérité » de la sainteté : la dissolution du moi qui en est le préalable, les flux entre le sujet et le monde qu’elle autorise. Mais la naissance de l’hagiographe n’a pas impliqué pour autant la disparition du romancier et du critique d’art. Ainsi, « hagiofiction » et « hagiocritique » plutôt qu’hagiographie, l’œuvre singulière de Huysmans fait de la peau de Lydwine la figure d’un art total, point de convergence de ses intérêts esthétiques, grâce à laquelle il poursuit une réflexion sur la réversibilité du réel et de la mimesis, des corps et des images, de la nature et l’artifice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".