MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416360391 · doi:10.1002/aqc.70259

Rare Aggregations: Seasonal Variations and Abundance of the Critically Endangered Widenose Guitarfish ( <i>Glaucostegus obtusus</i> )

2025· article· en· W4416360391 on OpenAlexaff
Bruna Miranda, Trisha Gupta, Diya Das, Kulbhushansingh Suryawanshi, Evan Nazareth, Divya Karnad

Bibliographic record

VenueAquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIchthyology and Marine Biology
Canadian institutionsMaRSCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
FundersSave Our Seas Foundation
KeywordsCritically endangeredEndangered speciesAbundance (ecology)Threatened speciesPopulationHabitatPopulation size

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The widenose guitarfish ( Glaucostegus obtusus ) is a Critically Endangered shark‐like ray in the Northern Indian Ocean. They aggregate in shallow waters where they may be threatened by nearshore fisheries, tourism and coastal development, yet their use of these spaces is not well documented. Understanding their population sizes and seasonal use of these nearshore waters is crucial in developing effective conservation strategies. We estimated the abundance of juvenile widenose guitarfish across 10 beaches in South Goa, India, and their variation with seasonal, environmental and anthropogenic factors. We walked transects along the wave line (< 30 cm deep) from September 2023 to March 2024 to record guitarfish counts, sizes and distribution. The total juvenile guitarfish abundance was estimated through N‐mixture modelling as 538 individuals over 25 km of coastline. Galgibaga Beach had significantly higher juvenile abundances (205 individuals, 95% CI: 191–217), indicating the presence of a nursery ground, and has been identified as an Important Shark and Ray Area (ISRA) based on our work. November showed the highest relative abundance of juveniles (35.14 ± 38.47), suggesting that this month is a potential pupping season. We provide first estimates for the population of this species in India and new insights into their ecology, highlighting critical habitats and seasons where conservation efforts, like spatiotemporal restrictions or live release measures, could be directed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater EcosystemsSame topicIchthyology and Marine BiologyFrench-language works237,207