Correction: Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Correction: Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-025-01958-5<br/><br/>The Image Sources and Credits information section was missing from this article and should have read ‘The FCC Project formally acknowledges and credits all organisations and contributors whose data and imagery form part of the basemaps used in this work. These include © Esri, Airbus DS, FAO, FEMA, GSA, NASA, NGA, NOAA, USGS, CGIAR, NCEAS, Rijkswaterstaat, SITG – State of Geneva (CH), swisstopo, Facebook, Garmin, Geoland, Geodatastyrelsen, Google, Intermap, Maxar, Microsoft, N Robinson, NLS, NMA, OS, Planet, TomTom, as well as © OpenStreetMap contributors, Esri Community Maps contributors, and the GIS User Community.<br/><br/>Every effort has been made to correctly acknowledge all data providers and rights holders. Any omission is unintentional, and the FCC Project remains available to review and amend credits upon request from legitimate data owners.’<br/><br/>The original article has been corrected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it