MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416362856 · doi:10.3917/rs1.085.0174c

Les territoires de l’intervention à domicile : regards croisés France-Québec Christian Jetté, Catherine Lenzi (dir.), Paris, L’Harmattan, 2020, 264 p.

2021· article· W4416362856 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRetraite et société · 2021
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Identity (music)Subject (documents)Agency (philosophy)Context (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les auteursMichel Billet est sociologue, spécialiste des questions relatives au handicap et à la vieillesse.Il est également président de l'Union nationale des instances et offices de retraités et personnes âgées, et membre du conseil scientifique sciences humaines de France Alzheimer.Didier Martz est philosophe, essayiste, conférencier, formateur, consultant, animateur de cafés et de goûters de philosophie, chroniqueur radio.Il est membre et animateur du think tank « Droit de Cité » à Reims, de l'association Jalmalv ( Jusqu'à la mort accompagner la vie) et de divers comités d'éthique. L'ouvrageDans un contexte démographique inédit, où le monde occidental est vieillissant et où la proportion des plus vieux n'a jamais été aussi importante, les personnes âgées sont devenues un enjeu majeur, une problématique de société, tant au niveau sociologique que politique ou économique.L'objet de ce livre a pour but de mieux comprendre la Caisse nationale d'assurance vieillesse | Telecharge le 20/11/2025 sur https://shs.cairn.info(IP: 149.143.190.123)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRetraite et sociétéSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207