MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416366413 · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3634991

Robust Higher-Order Sliding Mode Control for Virtual Synchronous Generators to Enhance Stability Under Varying Network Conditions

2025· article· en· W4416366413 on OpenAlexafffund
Tuhin Subhra Das, U.D. Annakkage, In Kwon Park, Dharshana Muthumuni

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsRTDS Technologies (Canada)Manitoba HydroUniversity of Manitoba
FundersManitoba Hydro
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Robustness (evolution)Robust controlGridController (irrigation)AdaptabilityVoltageElectric power systemStability (learning theory)Sliding mode control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Virtual Synchronous Generator (VSG) enables inverter-based resources (IBRs) to emulate the dynamic behavior of synchronous generators, enhancing grid-forming capability and power system stability. Conventional control strategies like Multi-Loop PI (ML PI) for cascaded voltage and current control, though widely used, rely on fixed gain parameters and lack adaptability across varying grid strengths, characterized by the Short Circuit Ratio (SCR). To overcome these limitations, this paper proposes a robust Higher Order Sliding Mode Control (HOSMC) strategy for cascaded voltage and current control in VSGs. HOSMC inherently provides variable gain, strong robustness to parameter uncertainties and disturbances, and finite-time convergence, without requiring gain retuning as grid conditions change. Moreover, it mitigates chattering through continuous control laws, addressing a key limitation of traditional SMC. Unlike most nonlinear controls, HOSMC allows frequency-domain stability analysis, simplifying controller design and assessment. The proposed approach is evaluated through small-signal stability analysis and electromagnetic transient (EMT) simulations across a wide range of SCR and X/R ratios. Results show that HOSMC achieves higher and more uniform stability margins than ML PI. A scenario involving dynamic SCR variation is simulated by switching a transmission line, with the VSG operating in the IEEE 118-bus system. The system remains stable throughout, demonstrating the control’s robustness. Real-time Controller Hardware-in-the-Loop (CHIL) validation confirms the practical feasibility of HOSMC under varying grid conditions, including SCR variations, voltage and frequency disturbances, and large faults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.865

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207