MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416366643 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2025.3634519

Unified Mathematical Framework for Channel Estimation in VLC Systems With Signal-Dependent Noise

2025· article· W4416366643 on OpenAlexafffund
Asma Wasfi, Maysa Yaseen, Falah Awwad, Salama Ikki

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsVisible light communicationEstimatorChannel (broadcasting)Noise (video)Upper and lower boundsNoise powerRelative intensity noiseNoise measurementBayesian probability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Channel estimation is essential for reliable high-speed data in visible light communication (VLC) systems. This work models the VLC channel with random user location and incorporates thermal noise, signal-dependent shot noise (SDSN), and relative intensity noise (RIN) into a unified mathematical framework. The Bayesian Cramér–Rao lower bound (BCRLB) is derived, and five estimators (LS, ML, MAP, LMMSE, MMSE) are implemented and evaluated. Results show MMSE offers the best performance, nearing the BCRLB, while RIN significantly degrades accuracy, especially at high transmitted power. The study quantifies how increasing the number of transmitted pilots consistently improves system performance, even in the presence of dependent noise, whereas increasing power under dependent noise does not always lead to performance gains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207