Cartas aos sobre-viventes: coletivo Traços da Escuta, Rio Grande<br>Lettres aux sur-vivants: collectif Traços de Escuta, Rio Grande
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ResumoO seguinte conjunto de cartas foi produzido pelo grupo de psicólogos Traços de Escuta, que trabalha no Rio Grande, acompanhados por um orientador. Lida com os efeitos traumáticos da pandemia sobre os terapeutas e questiona a morte como ela se manifesta na clínica para cada membro do grupo, desde a transição da clínica na rua para a clínica online.RésuméL’ensemble de lettres qui suit a été produit par le groupe de psychologues Traços de Escuta, qui travaille à Rio Grande, accompagné d’un superviseur. Il traite des effets traumatiques de la pandémie sur les thérapeutes et pose la question de la mort telle qu’elle se manifeste dans la clinique pour chacun des membres du groupe depuis le passage de la clinique dans la rue à la clinique on-line.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".