Using Gauge Covariant Lie Derivatives in Poincaré Gauge and Metric Teleparallel Theories of Gravity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A procedure to determine the initial ansatz for the co-frame and spin connection characterizing a Riemann-Cartan geometry respecting a given group of continuous symmetries is illustrated. Given a particular group of symmetries and assuming an orthonormal gauge we can determine the co-frame and corresponding spin connection having this symmetry group by employing an gauge covariant Lie derivative. This gauge covariant Lie derivative when applied to the metric and co-frame determines the values of an antisymmetric compensating matrix. The derivative of this matrix then yields the corresponding spin connection. The procedure is straightforward and can be employed for any Riemann-Cartan geometry having symmetries including those with a non-trivial isotropy subgroup. Here we illustrate the procedure with numerous examples, including, spherically symmetric, plane symmetric, locally rotationally symmetric Bianchi type III, Gödel, de Sitter and anti-de Sitter geometries. Further, we have also solved the zero curvature constraint to obtain the resulting spin connection for the corresponding metric teleparallel geometry having this same symmetry group. We complete this investigation by including the Lorentz transformation that yields the proper frame for some of these metric teleparallel geometries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it