Using Gauge Covariant Lie Derivatives in Poincaré Gauge and Metric Teleparallel Theories of Gravity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A procedure to determine the initial ansatz for the co-frame and spin connection characterizing a Riemann-Cartan geometry respecting a given group of continuous symmetries is illustrated. Given a particular group of symmetries and assuming an orthonormal gauge we can determine the co-frame and corresponding spin connection having this symmetry group by employing an gauge covariant Lie derivative. This gauge covariant Lie derivative when applied to the metric and co-frame determines the values of an antisymmetric compensating matrix. The derivative of this matrix then yields the corresponding spin connection. The procedure is straightforward and can be employed for any Riemann-Cartan geometry having symmetries including those with a non-trivial isotropy subgroup. Here we illustrate the procedure with numerous examples, including, spherically symmetric, plane symmetric, locally rotationally symmetric Bianchi type III, Gödel, de Sitter and anti-de Sitter geometries. Further, we have also solved the zero curvature constraint to obtain the resulting spin connection for the corresponding metric teleparallel geometry having this same symmetry group. We complete this investigation by including the Lorentz transformation that yields the proper frame for some of these metric teleparallel geometries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".