MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416382650 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v17n4p54

Existence and Uniqueness of the Weak Solution for a Traveling Crane Model With Viscous Damping and Nonlinear Controls

2025· article· W4416382650 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dansou Corine Ornella, Adama Coulibaly, Abro Goh Andre-Pascal, Touré K. Augustin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicContact Mechanics and Variational Inequalities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUniquenessNonlinear systemWeak solutionDifferentiable functionBoundary (topology)Boundary value problemMeasure (data warehouse)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we address the regularity of weak solutions to a crane model subject to nonlinear boundary feedback and distributed viscous damping, considered up to sets of measure zero. Based on the weak formulation of the system, the Faedo-Galerkin method is applied to prove existence and uniqueness of solutions. The use of suitable intermediate spaces then allows us to enhance regularity results and establish additional differentiability properties, offering a more precise characterization of the system's dynamics and a solid foundation for subsequent numerical analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.142
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematics ResearchSame topicContact Mechanics and Variational InequalitiesFrench-language works237,207